– Margins were under 3,000 votes in 35 seats.
– Margins were less than 5,000 votes in another 52 seats.
– Individual examples include wins and losses by as few as 12 votes for RJD’s Shakti Singh yadav in Hilsa and 189 votes for RJD candidate Avinash manglam’s narrow win against BSP competition at Ramgarh.
The Opposition’s concerns about electoral roll revisions reflect broader anxiety stemming from past experiences with tight election margins. Given that results from previous polls often hinged on differences smaller than a few thousand-or even hundreds-of ballots per constituency, changes to voter lists could exert ample influence on outcomes.
Both ruling and opposition parties should regard this issue with urgency but maintain clarity to ensure institutional trust via impartial oversight mechanisms. Concurrently, growing support for Prashant Kishor shows how third-party movements can challenge established entities when younger demographics see them as authentic alternatives-a dynamic likely amplified if disenfranchisement fears escalate.
Electoral integrity remains paramount as contested processes risk damaging faith not only within Bihar but nationally regarding India’s democratic framework-a crucial cornerstone amid transformative political developments across states.
Read more: The Hindu