This proposed amendment raises fundamental questions about balancing accountability with democratic principles. while Mr. shah advocates moral rectitude in governance by barring leaders with serious legal issues from occupying constitutional offices temporarily or permanently, critics like Mayawati argue that such measures risk politicization and misuse by ruling parties against opponents – potentially destabilizing India’s democratic fabric.
The fierce opposition reflects broader concerns about whether legal reforms could erode federalism or be wielded selectively under certain regimes. if passed without consensus-building among stakeholders across party lines or adequate safeguards against exploitation, this amendment might lead to long-term challenges both in governance systems and public trust in institutions.
For further details: Read More