The absence of project submissions by Andhra pradesh under PMAY-U 2.0 raises questions regarding long-term housing strategies and innovation adoption mechanisms within the State’s urban growth priorities. Even though the State demonstrated initiative during an earlier phase with Monolithic Construction Technology, the omission of applications to access available grants for innovative construction solutions suggests either administrative or policy gaps.
Maharashtra’s proactive stance highlights differing approaches among States toward utilizing central schemes aimed at affordable housing and technology-driven resilience-a importent comparison considering regional vulnerabilities like cyclones along coastal Andhra Pradesh.
For India as a whole,this case underscores the necessity to streamline processes supporting inter-state participation in central initiatives while prioritizing awareness around resource optimization through schemes such as TIG.
Read more: The Hindu