– The bill woudl lead to “extreme centralization” of sports administration.
– The Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) would receive favorable treatment and may not be subject to laws like RTI.
– Had requested that the bill be referred to a committee for further examination. This request was ignored by the government.
– Both the National Sports Governance Bill and National Anti-Doping (Amendment) bill were passed via voice vote.
the passage of significant legislation such as the National Sports Governance Bill raises important governance questions. On one hand, Sports Minister Mansukh Mandaviya’s statement that this represents a major reform sence independence highlights its potential to reshape India’s sports administration positively. However, concerns about centralization and lack of independent oversight merit attention.
The government’s decision to bypass wider parliamentary scrutiny could signal efficiency but risks undermining democratic practices if critical voices are excluded from legislative processes. Allegations regarding preferential treatment for institutions like BCCI warrant openness going forward. Balancing reforms with inclusivity will be crucial to foster trust across all stakeholders in India’s sports ecosystem.
Read more: The Hindu