Tejashwi Alleges Muzaffarpur Mayor Holds Dual Voter IDs Amidst Deputy CM Controversy

Quick Summary

• Tejashwi Yadav’s Allegations:

– Leader of Opposition in Bihar, Tejashwi Yadav, accused muzaffarpur mayor Nirmala Devi (likely BJP candidate) of possessing two Electoral Photo Identity Card (EPIC) numbers and having inconsistencies in her recorded age.
– He also alleged that Devi’s brothers-in-law hold dual EPIC numbers.

• Previous Accusation:

– On August 10, Yadav claimed Bihar Deputy CM Vijay Kumar Sinha also had two EPIC numbers for different constituencies and questioned the selective notices sent by electoral officers.

• Claims Against BJP Leadership:

– RJD leader claimed Bihar BJP General Secretary Bhikhubhai Dalsania shifted his voter registration from Gujarat to Patna district after the last Lok Sabha elections.

• Electoral Process Criticism:

– Alleged that voters sympathetic to opposition parties are being removed during Special Intensive Revision by Election Commission of India (ECI).

• Broader Remarks on Election Commission & BJP actions:

– Claimed ECI was being misused as a tool against opposition parties along with agencies like CBI, ED, and income Tax Department.
– Criticized the lack of media briefings from Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar amidst ongoing election-related activities.

Indian Opinion Analysis

The allegations raised by Tejashwi Yadav spotlight concerns about irregularities within electoral systems and potential misuse of political influence over institutions like the Election Commission of India. While these claims require thorough investigation for factual substantiation, they bring attention to broader systemic issues such as double voter IDs, constituency-linked inconsistencies, and openness in voter list revisions. The repeated targeting of officials associated with one political party raises questions about partisan competition filtering into administrative domains critical to democracy.

If proven true, these allegations could challenge public confidence in India’s election management systems-key pillars supporting democratic governance-and necessitate stronger auditing mechanisms to uphold integrity.For now, a neutral adjudication free from partisan interests becomes essential not only to address current accusations but also prevent erosion of faith in institutional impartiality.

Read more here: Source