The Bar Council’s move reflects serious concerns regarding quality control in India’s legal education sector. with sub-standard institutions reportedly mushrooming unchecked across states due to inadequate oversight mechanisms like routine issuance of No Objection Certificates (NOCs) by state governments or affiliations granted without inspections-such regulation was overdue.
Given India’s existing capacity with approximately 2,000 law centres already operational, prioritising quality enhancement over quantitative expansion seems pragmatic. Intensified auditing processes could act as a deterrent against academic laxity while reinforcing standards crucial for maintaining public trust in higher education systems tied directly to constitutional governance.Though, careful attention must be given during implementation to ensure genuine high-quality institutions are not disproportionately affected throughout inspections or enforcement stages-a concern raised previously when similar measures faced judicial setbacks due to procedural oversights.
The broader implication lies in re-establishing institutional credibility within the legal academic sphere-a step critical both for professional integrity in law practice as well as public faith toward regulatory agencies overseeing Indian higher education systems.
Images: