Quick Summary:
– elephants strayed out over 9,710 times;
– Resulted in 147 deaths between 2011-2022;
– ₹11.35 crore compensation paid for fatalities.
– Terrain concerns include steep slopes with no buffer zones for elephant navigation.
– Risks of elephant mortality cited due to restricted movements or forced interaction with fences.
– Potential conflicts may shift outside fenced areas rather than resolve them entirely.
– Urge scientific studies before implementation and consolidation of notified elephant corridors.
Indian Opinion Analysis:
The planned inspection by Madras High Court underscores the complexity of balancing conservation efforts and community safety amidst growing Human-Elephant Conflicts (HEC). The data presented highlights significant loss-both human lives and financial costs-while traditional solutions have proven ineffective locally.
From governance perspective, Tamil Nadu’s push for innovative measures like steel wire fencing reflects urgency to address conflicts systematically rather than reliance on outdated methods. Though, objections raised by activists and amici curiae regarding ecological impacts merit careful consideration. Their call for scientific studies aligns with broader principles of sustainable wildlife management while protecting human settlements.
For India collectively managing man-animal conflict like above sustainable/local stake balance emerges CSS Ethical debates nearby longer-term “Why corridor investment awaiting risks escalations conservatory”
—
Read More: