Meghwal Defends 130th Amendment Bill, Points to Kejriwal’s Jail Stance

rapid Summary

• Union Law Minister Arjun Ram Meghwal defended teh 130th Constitutional Amendment Bill,calling it “progressive legislation.”
• The bill, introduced alongside two others by Union Home Minister amit Shah in Lok Sabha, seeks to remove Prime Ministers, Chief Ministers, and Ministers arrested on serious criminal charges for over 30 days.
• Opposition parties criticized the bills amidst claims of potential misuse; Meghwal argued that critics may not have fully read their details.
• Meghwal questioned whether opposition to the bill implies support for corruption and cited AAP leader Arvind Kejriwal’s past decision not to resign as delhi CM while incarcerated.
• Among the three bills are:

– Goverment of Union Territories (Amendment) bill 2025,
– Constitution (130th Amendment) Bill 2025,
– Jammu and Kashmir Reorganisation (amendment) Bill 2025.

• Meghwal also highlighted India’s armed forces’ role during ‘Operation Sindoor,’ which was discussed during Parliament’s monsoon session.
• He participated in a tree plantation drive in Indore under a campaign encouraging citizens to plant trees in honor of their mothers.Madhya Pradesh Minister Kailash Vijayvargiya also attended.

Indian Opinion Analysis

The introduction of these legislative measures represents an effort by the government to set ethical benchmarks for officeholders facing serious criminal allegations. On paper, this proposal aligns with broader goals like enhancing accountability and reducing corruption within public office. Though, concerns voiced by opposition parties are equally significant-they underscore fears about potential misuse or selective enforcement against political adversaries.

India has long debated striking a balance between punitive accountability measures and safeguarding democratic principles like due process. If implemented transparently without bias, these laws could strengthen governance standards; however, any perceived politicization could intensify mistrust toward institutions. For citizens observing this debate unfold amid ongoing legislative changes like the Jammu & Kashmir reorganization amendments or UT governance updates-clarity on safeguards ensuring fairness will likely be paramount.

Read more: The Hindu