The repeated reshuffling of judges in the ongoing trial underscores significant procedural challenges within India’s judiciary when handling complex cases like this one involving alleged conspiracy under stringent laws such as UAPA. While legal processes can understandably take years due to evidence gathering and rigorous scrutiny over charges against multiple high-profile defendants, frequent disruptions erode public trust and highlight inefficiencies-especially for victims awaiting justice after tragic riots that disrupted lives deeply.
The direction by ASJ Lalit Kumar seeking precise timelines from both prosecution teams and defense counsels appears pragmatic but hinges on strict adherence moving forward to avoid undue delays further stretching an already prolonged judicial narrative spanning half a decade as the filing began first originating By requesting structured argument order optimism ensuring opposing delays aligning best adjudicating transparent scrutiny accountability balancing horrific/politicized clash devastation