Rapid Summary:
- Fresh inconsistencies have surfaced in Bengaluru’s tunnel road project report (DPR), proposed between Hebbal and silk Board junction.
- Critics allege outdated studies, unverifiable assumptions, and implausible traffic projections undermine the DPR’s credibility.
- Table 93 shows identical vehicle numbers for both directions in traffic estimates for 2027-28, which experts call a statistical impossibility.
- Urban transport experts criticize BBMP’s flawed transport modelling, citing selective use of outdated studies and unverified data inputs.
- Major flaws noted include inaccurate forecasts,minimal justification for the project’s high-cost investment,and misalignment with Bangalore’s most congested corridors.
- Experts demand openness through public peer review of the full DPR and urge integration with buses and Metro to avoid benefiting only private vehicle users.

Read More
Indian Opinion Analysis:
The flagged flaws in Bengaluru’s tunnel road DPR highlight critical gaps in urban infrastructure planning amidst its rapidly evolving mobility needs.Reliance on outdated studies or statistically implausible data erodes trust in projects worth thousands of crores of public funding. Calls from mobility experts to integrate wider alternatives – such as buses or Metro systems – underscore a broader need to prioritize inclusive solutions rather than focusing narrowly on car-centric infrastructure that risks serving only elite demographics.Transparency through peer reviews is a rational demand given the scale of investment involved; greater scrutiny can ensure projects are rooted firmly in current data-driven realities rather than speculative assumptions or mismatches with actual congestion zones across the city.