In a major victory for many landowners, the High Court of Karnataka has set aside acquisition of several acres for the controversial Bangalore Mysore Infrastructure Corridor (BMIC) project as the Karnataka Industrial Areas Development Board (KIADB) had failed to pass awards for these lands even some 23 years after issuing final notifications.
Justice R. Devdas passed the order on July 4 while allowing a batch of petitions, filed between 2014 and 2024, by P. Manjunatha Reddy and other landowners.
The petitioner-landowners contended that the acquisition process could not be sustained as the KIADB’s special land acquisition officer (SLAO) had failed to pass awards till date even though the preliminary notifications of acquisition under Section 28(1) of the KIAD Act, 1966 were issued between 1998 and 2009, and the final notifications, under Section 28(4) of the Act, were issued between 2003 and 2009.
Justice Devdas relied on a verdict passed in 2023 by a Division Bench of the High Court in KIADB vs M. Shakunthalamma’s case in which it had set aside an acquired land, which too was notified for the BMIC project, on the ground that no award was passed even after a lapse of 11 years since issuance of the final notification. The court also noted that the apex court had confirmed the Division Bench’s judgment in the Shakunthalamma case.
In the present case, the court noted that over 23 years had lapsed since the notifications for acquisition were issued between 1998 and 2009, and the awards had not been passed by the SLAO till today.
‘Having regard to the plight of the landowners who are deprived of the use and occupation of lands and they losing their livelihood, this court has no other option, than to follow the judgment of the Division Bench in M. Shakunthalamma’s case,” the court observed.
Pointing out that petitioner-landowners had contended that their lands were not part of the BMIC project and no part of their lands had been utilised by the KIADB or the project proponent — Nandi Infrastructure Corridor Enterprises — for the formation of interchanges, toll plazas, peripheral road or link road, which were part of the project, the court noted that this claim of the petitioners were not controverted by the KIADB and others.
Even though the courts had earlier upheld the legality of the preliminary and final notifications for acquiring these lands, the court said that not passing award was a fresh cause of action to challenge the validity of land acquisition proceedings.
‘Pass awards afresh based on 2019 market value of lands’
In a boon for some persons who lost their lands to the BMIC project, the High Court of Karnataka directed the KIADB to pass awards afresh for some of the lands, notified way back in 2003, for which the KIADB passed awards between 2019 and 2024 based on the land values between 2003 and 2011.
Justice Devdas passed the order while disposing of a batch of petitions filed by A. Abdul Rehman Khan and others, whose lands were acquired for the project.
The court passed the order while citing Supreme Court’s January 2025 verdict in the case of Bernard Francis Joseph Vaz and others vs Government of Karnataka, in which the apex court directed the KIADB to pass an award fresh by taking the market value of the land as existed in 2019.
In Bernard’s case, the land was acquired in 2003 and utilised for the project sans passing award. However, the KIADB passed the award in 2019 relying on the 2011 market value of that land.
Rejecting the pleas against extending the benefit of Bernard’s case verdict to the petitioners, the High Court said that “there cannot be discrimination in the matter of determination and award of compensation”.
