Ramadoss and Anbumani Convene Separate Meetings with Party Leaders

Quick Summary

• The feud within the PMK party between founder S. Ramadoss and president Anbumani Ramadoss persists.
• On Tuesday, S. Ramadoss held an executive council meeting in Dindivanam,while Anbumani convened the Governing Body meeting in Chennai.
• S. ramadoss allowed his eldest daughter, Srigandhi, to address the gathering and demanded PMK’s inclusion in a coalition government-a resolution later adopted by his faction.
• He asserted authority to sign forms A and B for candidates and lead decision-making on alliances for 2026 State Assembly elections while flanked by loyalists G.K. mani, Dheeran, and A.K. Moorthy.
• During his speech, Dr. Ramadoss reflected on party history, hardships faced by members since its founding, and called for preparations for candidate applications ahead of elections.
• Meanwhile, Anbumani discussed plans with office bearers regarding a padayatra planned from July 25 across Tamil Nadu as part of party strategy.
• Sources close to Anbumani dismissed Dr. Ramadoss’s meeting as “not binding,” citing governance procedural norms that prioritize general body decisions over founder recommendations when contested.
• PMK resolutions included organizing a protest against DMK on July 20 over internal reservations for Vanniyars.

Indian Opinion Analysis

The ongoing leadership conflict between S. Ramadoss and Anbumani highlights internal divisions within PMK that could affect its cohesion heading into the crucial 2026 State Assembly elections in Tamil Nadu.While both leaders assert respective authority-the founder relies on legacy-based loyalty whereas the president focuses on future-oriented strategies like padayatras-the discord may result in fragmented decision-making or voter confusion about who commands genuine influence within the party.

Srigandhi’s introduction onto center stage during her father’s rally could signal attempts to bring familial dynamics into active political roles-possibly indicative of long-term succession plans or gender-inclusive strategies within local political frameworks.

PMK’s consistent focus on Vanniyar-specific issues (such as internal reservations) signals adherence to core community-driven concerns but risks alienating wider voter bases if not balanced correctly going forward.

As both camps appear committed to their independent agendas without compromise thus far, this rivalry poses challenges not only internally but also concerning alliance-building with other parties looking toward stable collaborative partners ahead of statewide elections.

Link: Read More