– Discrepancies like mass omissions or incorrect entries undermine fair elections and dilute votes.
– The EC is empowered under RPA, 1950 to revise rolls while preventing fraudulent registrations through rigorous criteria like “ordinary residence.”
– Past judgments stress adherence to due process for citizenship verification and roll accuracy during such exercises.
– Allegations regarding ‘citizenship verification’ must follow legal safeguards established in past rulings.
– Inclusion efforts should balance vigilance with fairness.
India’s commitment to universal adult suffrage remains one of its most progressive democratic milestones. However, ensuring electoral integrity demands constant vigilance from institutions like the Election Commission.The Bihar SIR exercise underscores critical issues around inclusion and accuracy in voter registration-a democratic imperative that affects representation and governance quality.
The Supreme Court’s proactive steps reflect growing concerns about disenfranchisement risks during roll revisions. By broadening acceptable documents beyond voter ID alone, it aims at inclusiveness while safeguarding against fraud-vital components for public trust in elections.
This controversy highlights another layer-the fragile balance between vigilance on citizenship versus exclusionary practices tied to bureaucratic errors or systemic oversights. Maintaining this equilibrium will require robust legal adherence combined with active public participation-a practical step voters can take by verifying their entries on electoral rolls.
Looking ahead toward reforms poised between inclusivity goals and enforcement rigor is essential-not only institutionally but also as part of India’s collective civic obligation.
read more here: Source