– Harish Rao submitted additional facts after reports of alleged misinformation in media coverage.
– He provided compiled notes and supporting documents detailing Cabinet decisions made during former Chief Minister K. Chandrashekar Rao’s tenure, emphasizing six separate Cabinet discussions and three approvals by the Assembly.
– Despite requests for government-held records, no response was received from relevant authorities regarding Cabinet notes.
– Rao accused the current government of misleading the Commission with incorrect data and criticized efforts at presenting differing narratives about water-sharing arrangements between Andhra Pradesh and Telangana.
– he cited approval by Telangana Legislature as being more importent than Cabinet decisions alone while refraining from disclosing all details to maintain confidentiality under ongoing inquiry.
The inquiry into possible irregularities surrounding a cornerstone infrastructure project like Telangana’s Kaleshwaram stands out for its intricacies relating not just to governance but also policy execution involving inter-state resource sharing. the detailed submissions by BRS leader Harish Rao illuminate both technical deliberations at Cabinet levels during key phases of governance alongside accompanying legislative endorsements.
However,persistent tension between opposing political narratives-whether on water allocation or project designs-underscores how resource-related projects often invite contentious discourse amid shifting administrations. Moving forward, maintaining transparency is critical to public trust; this may necessitate thorough access to official records requested by involved parties.The allegations raised further spotlight how long-term institutional oversight on mega-projects remains essential in ensuring accountability without jeopardizing progress goals.
read More: The Hindu