SC Criticizes Chhattisgarh Police for UAPA Misuse

Speedy Summary

• The Supreme Court criticized the Chhattisgarh Police for adding Unlawful Activities Prevention Act (UAPA) charges against an individual to undermine a previous order for interim protection.
• A division bench led by Justice AS Oka described the police’s action as “hasty” and labeled it a “grossest impropriety.”
• Contempt of court warnings were issued against the involved police officer.
• The court granted bail to Manish Rathore, making its earlier interim order for his protection from arrest in a criminal case absolute.
• After an initial order in January, additional UAPA charges were added to another FIR where Rathore had already been granted bail.
• State counsel defended the police, citing that Rathore had previously jumped bail and was allegedly involved in Naxalite activities.

Indian Opinion Analysis

The Supreme Court’s censure of the Chhattisgarh Police highlights crucial issues regarding legal procedures and misuse of stringent laws like UAPA. Such actions not only undermine judicial authority but also pose risks to civil liberties. By taking steps against perceived impropriety,the court reinforces checks on law enforcement agencies’ power. This incident raises broader concerns about transparency and accountability within policing practices, emphasizing that laws intended for protecting national security should be applied judiciously to prevent potential abuse.Read More

!Supreme court Illustration