SC Declines to Hear YSRCP MP’s Anticipatory Bail Plea in A.P. Liquor Scam

Quick Summary

• The Supreme Court dismissed an appeal made by YSRCP MP P.V. Midhun Reddy against the Andhra Pradesh High Court’s refusal to grant him anticipatory bail in a liquor scam case.
• Mr. Reddy, represented by senior advocates, argued that he was wrongly implicated, emphasizing his position as a three-time MP and denying substantive allegations.
• The State claimed evidence linked Mr. Reddy indirectly via financial transactions involving PLR Projects Private Limited and family ties to the company; Mr. Reddy denied direct involvement.
• The petition described the State’s changing stance as “shocking,” accusing it of harassment and politically motivated bias aligned with the ruling Telugu Desam Party (TDP).
• Prior cases involving co-accused were referenced where pre-arrest bail had been denied on grounds that custodial interrogation might be hindered.

Indian Opinion analysis

The Supreme Court’s decision underscores the importance of judicial scrutiny in politically sensitive cases like this liquor scam inquiry. By dismissing Mr. Reddy’s plea for anticipatory bail, it signals judicial support for thorough investigations without interference from high-profile individuals or political affiliations. Allegations of political motivations and shifting positions by authorities highlight complexities often seen in cases involving prominent figures, testing India’s justice system’s ability to remain impartial.

The case raises critical concerns about balancing individual rights with investigative needs-especially when public interest intertwines with claims of harassment or misuse of power.Irrespective of political affiliations or reputations cited during arguments,evidence-based proceedings must remain central to justice delivery for openness and trust in governance mechanisms.

Read more here