Modi Govt Backed OBCs, Congress Resisted Reservations: Pradhan

Rapid Summary

• on July 25, 2025, BJP accused Congress of neglecting backward classes (OBCs) and highlighted measures taken by the Modi government for their welfare.
• Union Education Minister Dharmendra Pradhan dismissed Congress’ accusations that the Modi government had failed OBC communities. He stated it was the frist time India had an OBC leader as Prime Minister.
• Pradhan alleged Congress historically opposed reservations for SC/ST/OBC categories:

– Mentioned instances where former PMs Pandit Jawaharlal nehru, Indira Gandhi, and rajiv Gandhi resisted reservation policies.
– Claimed Sitaram Kesri (former Congress chief from an OBC community) was humiliated within his party.

• Highlighted advancements during Modi’s tenure:

– Enactment of the Central Educational Institutions (Reservation in Teachers’ Cadre) Act in 2019 to safeguard reserved posts for SC/ST/OBC categories in higher education teaching positions.
– Comparison of vacancies between Central institutions: In 2014, there were ~16,000 teaching posts with a vacancy rate of 37%. By 2025,posts increased to ~19,000 with only a vacancy rate of 25%.

• Affirmed that over 8,150 SC/ST/OBC candidates were appointed across educational institutions under current efforts to minimize vacancies.

Indian Opinion analysis

The BJP’s emphasis on its initiatives for the welfare of backward communities showcases its attempt to drive narratives around social inclusivity under PM Narendra Modi’s leadership.The referenced data about increased employment opportunities and institutional enhancements may reflect focused administrative action but leaves room for further evaluation regarding execution effectiveness.

The criticism directed at past Congress leaders underscores broader political contestation surrounding past policy stances on reservation systems. However, such retrospective claims should be assessed carefully against documented evidence where appropriate.

From an Indian perspective focusing on governance outcomes rather than rhetoric will be essential; any ongoing reduction in teaching post vacancies could positively impact higher education quality and representation from marginalized groups. For voters interested in tangible progress over partisan clashes, tracking real-time implementations rather than verbal exchanges is crucial.

Read more: Source