Supreme Court to Hear Pleas on Rohingya Refugee Status and Deportation

Quick summary

• The Supreme Court of India on July 31, 2025, decided to examine whether Rohingyas can be categorized as refugees or illegal immigrants.
• A three-judge Bench led by Justice Surya Kant will conduct a detailed three-day hearing to determine this classification and it’s consequences.
• Representing Rohingya petitioners living in camps in Delhi, advocates argued for protection under refugee status and contested government deportation actions.
• The petitions have highlighted prolonged detentions of individuals declared as foreigners and the lack of basic amenities in camps.
• Petitioners emphasized constitutional protections against deportation citing non-refoulement principles that prevent returning individuals to places where they face harm.
• solicitor general Tushar Mehta stated India is not a signatory to the UN Refugee Convention and referenced national security concerns under Section 3 of the Foreigners Act.
• Previous court observations noted that if deemed “foreigners,” rohingyas would be subject to Indian legal provisions governing such cases.

Indian Opinion Analysis
The Supreme Court’s decision to investigate the status of Rohingyas reflects india’s broader challenge balancing humanitarian obligations with immigration control policies amidst complex geopolitical realities. This categorical determination-refugees or illegal immigrants-has far-reaching implications for both domestic law enforcement and international relations regarding displaced populations fleeing persecution worldwide. While arguments from human rights perspectives invoke constitutional safeguards,the government underscores its authority under domestic laws prioritizing security interests over international conventions it has not ratified.

This case highlights critical debates around refugee policy frameworks in nations like India that navigate large-scale migration without specific binding commitments under global treaties like the UN Refugee Convention while relying on general constitutional principles or ad hoc administrative decisions for addressing vulnerabilities among displaced groups.

Read more: https://www.thehindu.com/theme/images/th-online/1x1_spacer.png