The frustration expressed by victims’ families highlights deep concerns regarding delays or failures within judicial processes when addressing acts of terrorism. Sensitive cases such as Malegaon demand transparency and accountability not only from investigative agencies but also from legal systems. While courts base their decisions solely on evidence presented, unresolved questions about culpability could erode public trust over time.
Advocate Shahid Nadeem’s commitment to take further legal steps is noteworthy since it underscores a willingness among affected citizens for redressal using lawful avenues rather than resorting to disillusionment. Ensuring justice would require renewed efforts into investigations alongside sensitive handling in higher courts without compromising institutional integrity or procedural fairness-a collective imperative beyond individual tragedies.