Karnataka HC Upholds Policy Excluding Reservation for Honorary Anganwadi Posts

Fast Summary

• The Karnataka high Court ruled that the State government’s policy of not providing roster-based caste reservation for anganwadi worker posts is not in violation of constitutional provisions.
• the court clarified that anganwadi posts are “honorary” positions,paid through an honorarium rather then a salary,adn therefore do not require adherence to the reservation roster.
• Justice M.I. Arun passed the order dismissing a petition filed by Vijayalakshmi, a Scheduled Tribe (ST) aspirant from Vijayapura district who questioned the absence of caste-based reservations in such appointments.
• The government explained that candidates from Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes are considered for these roles if their population exceeds 40% in the area around an anganwadi center.
• In this case, low ST population levels did not warrant specific allocation of posts to individuals from this community at the petitioner’s anganwadi center location.
• Additionally, it was argued that anganwadi workers must inspire trust across all communities and cater to children universally; appointments prioritize collective acceptance over individual merit or reservation metrics.

Indian Opinion Analysis

The Karnataka High Court’s decision centers on defining anganwadi worker positions as honorary roles exempt from regular job protocols like salary or caste-based reservations.This judgment reinforces state discretion over policies shaped by unique practical considerations-such as demographic dynamics and service goals-in rural childcare initiatives. While affirming alignment with constitutional principles, it underscores limitations on judicial interference unless there’s clear evidence of violation.

This ruling could have broader implications for employment structures where roles are technically “honorary,” raising questions about equity versus eligibility criteria for marginalized communities seeking access to public service opportunities. It also highlights ongoing debates around balancing inclusivity with operational effectiveness in grassroots welfare programs.

Read more: Link
!A view of the High Court of Karnataka