The Bombay High Court’s decision to quash money-laundering charges against the Chamankar brothers underscores a notable precedent set by the Supreme Court regarding PMLA proceedings being contingent on predicate offences. this ruling could have broader implications for similar cases where primary charges lack considerable proof or legal finality. It also raises questions about prosecutorial consistency and oversight, given that failure to challenge key lower-court rulings can influence higher judicial decisions. Importantly,while legal clarity has been provided in this instance,ensuring accountability in governance remains crucial as public contracts directly affect citizens’ welfare and trust.
Read more here.