Bombay High Court Rejects Bail Plea of Ex-BJP MLA in Police Station Shooting Case

Swift Summary

• Bombay High Court on August 5, 2025, rejected the bail plea of former BJP MLA Ganpat Gaikwad.
• Gaikwad is accused of opening fire on Shiv Sena leader Mahesh Gaikwad and another individual, Rahul Patil, inside Hill Line police Station in Ulhasnagar. The incident occurred on February 2, 2024.
• Charges against him include attempt to murder (IPC Section 307), criminal conspiracy (120B), rioting (143-149), abetment (109), causing hurt (323), and violations under the Arms Act.
• It is alleged that after discharging his weapon at Mahesh Gaikwad inside the police cabin, he physically assaulted him further with the butt of his gun even while police officers were present.
• Judge Amit Borkar emphasized that such an act shakes public confidence in law enforcement’s ability to maintain order and represents a severe disregard for safety and civility in protected spaces like police stations.
• CCTV footage and ballistic reports strongly support the prosecution’s case. The bullets recovered from the injured victim match the revolver seized from Ganpat Gaikwad.
• An audio recording reportedly reveals Ganpat admitting to intent to kill without remorse during a public interview. According to court observations, this undermines his claim that actions were impulsive rather than premeditated.

Indian Opinion Analysis

The Bombay High Court’s decision underscores serious concerns about lawlessness within India’s political circles when elected representatives engage in violence at a venue as sacrosanct as a police station. this incident not onyl highlights an alleged intentional act of violence but also exposes alarming issues like access to firearms by politicians and their potential misuse.

Mahesh Gaikwad’s case raises broader questions about accountability among leaders sworn to uphold democratic principles. Furthermore,given its location-a space meant for justice-the event highlights challenges faced by India’s law-and-order machinery in ensuring public trust remains intact.

given reliance on modern investigative tools such as CCTV footage and forensic evidence demonstrated here, India seems well-equipped technologically for high-stakes cases but must ensure swift adjudication aligned with judicial integrity.

Read More