Speedy Summary
- Accusations: Indore-based cartoonist Hemant Malviya is accused of sharing “objectionable” cartoons involving Prime Minister Narendra Modi, RSS workers, and Lord Shiva. The FIR alleges these posts hurt religious sentiments and disturbed communal harmony.
- Legal Development: The Supreme Court has agreed to hear Mr. Malviya’s anticipatory bail plea on July 14,following the Madhya Pradesh High Court’s refusal to grant him relief.
- Charges Filed: Police have invoked several sections under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), including acts prejudicial to harmony (Sec. 196) and malicious attempts to outrage religious feelings (Sec. 299), alongside provisions from the Information Technology Act for electronic transmission of objectionable material.
- High Court Ruling: The Madhya Pradesh High Court stated Mr. Malviya’s actions amounted to a gross misuse of freedom of speech under Article 19(1)(a) and highlighted his alleged endorsement of demeaning remarks about Lord Shiva accompanying one caricature.
Indian Opinion Analysis
The legal case against Hemant Malviya raises pertinent questions about the bounds of freedom of speech in India as enshrined under Article 19(1)(a). While artistic expression enjoys constitutional protection, courts have drawn limits when such acts are deemed malicious attempts at offending religious or communal sentiments-critical issues in India’s pluralistic society.this case fits into broader debates concerning the balance between free speech and societal responsibility in public discourse.
The invocation of multiple laws, including IT Act provisions and BNS sections tailored for community harmony breaches, underscores an aggressive stance by authorities toward perceived provocations online. As the Supreme Court is set to review this matter, it holds significance for defining precedents on creative liberty versus accountability in today’s internet-driven age where context becomes highly scrutinized.
For more information: Click Here
!Image Source