Fast Summary:
– Removal or destruction of statutory labels such as batch numbers, expiry dates, MRP, and mandatory warnings (as per Rule 96 and Rule 97).
– Compromise in medicine stability and therapeutic efficacy due to improper handling under Schedule P1.
– Repacking conducted in unlicensed environments violating Good Manufacturing Practices (GMP) & Good Storage Practices (GSP).
Indian Opinion Analysis:
The allegations raised by the BDCDA underscore critical concerns about ensuring consumer safety within India’s healthcare ecosystem. regulatory violations such as tampering with packaging undermine transparency essential for patient trust.Accurate labelling safeguards are vital not only for compliance but also to prevent misuse or adverse health outcomes stemming from misinformation on expiration dates or dosages.
Furthermore,this controversy raises questions regarding evolving business models in health-tech startups that intersect traditional pharmaceutical practices. While innovation is critically important to improve healthcare accessibility, it must coexist with robust accountability mechanisms that prioritize public safety. The lack of proper oversight over online medicine sales could exacerbate risks if left unchecked.Demanding stricter enforcement of existing laws highlights India’s challenge in balancing technological advancements with well-defined statutory protections. Resolving this issue will require collaboration between regulators,pharmacy associations,startups,and consumers alike to uphold integrity without stifling innovation.
read more at The Hindu.