Chennai Police Seek to Cancel Madurai Adheenam’s Bail Over Cyber Crime Case

Quick Summary

• Teh cyber crime wing of Greater Chennai City Police has petitioned the Madras High Court to cancel anticipatory bail granted to Madurai Adheenam Harihara Gnanasambanda Desigar.
• The case stems from allegations that the pontiff made false statements promoting communal enmity between Hindus and Muslims after a minor car accident on May 2 at Ulundurpet in Kallakurichi district.
• Police assert that CCTV footage confirms it was a simple accident caused by speeding, not an assassination attempt as claimed by the pontiff.
• An FIR was registered against him under provisions of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), including promoting enmity and public mischief, on June 24.
• Despite being summoned for inquiry multiple times, the pontiff cited age and health concerns as reasons for delay or requested inquiries via video call, which is not permitted under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS).
• while granting anticipatory bail on July 17, the sessions court observed no intent by the accused to provoke communal issues; it also noted his advanced age and directed police inquiry at his residence.
• Police claim he was uncooperative during this inquiry due to gathered supporters impeding investigation efforts. A plea has now been filed asserting abuse of liberty granted under his bail terms.

Indian Opinion Analysis
This case underscores key challenges faced in India’s legal system regarding sensitive issues like communal tensions and enforcement of justice amidst high-profile personalities. The police cite evidence from CCTV footage contradicting claims made by the Adheenam about an alleged assassination attempt-a statement potentially impactful given its community-related implications in a diverse country like India.

The refusal to cooperate with investigations creates procedural friction between law enforcement agencies’ mandates and judicial accommodations provided owing to an individual’s age or status. Balancing respect for privacy while maintaining transparency is crucial here since such cases can influence public perceptions regarding credible investigations into influential figures.

If left unresolved swiftly or perceived as favoring any side inadequately, this issue might erode confidence in institutions combating misinformation with potential consequences for social harmony nationwide.

Read more: The Hindu