– AIMIM Floor leader Akbaruddin Owaisi criticized the goverment’s approach as inadequate and argued that no notable actions were recommended apart from recovery of funds from WAPCOS Limited.
– He questioned why earlier reports submitted by other agencies were not fully utilized in framing conclusions, expressing concern over the commission’s Terms of Reference.
– CM Reddy clarified that suggestions-not decisions-were sought from Assembly members before finalizing action plans based on findings from the report submitted by Justice P.C.Ghose’s commission.- The Chief Minister dismissed criticism and reaffirmed his commitment to holding accountable those responsible for financial mismanagement tied to KLIP.
The inquiry into alleged irregularities surrounding KLIP reflects broader concerns regarding openness and accountability in large-scale public infrastructure projects across India. The establishment of a judicial commission indicates intent on part of Chief Minister A. Revanth Reddy’s management to address these issues thoroughly; however, criticisms about insufficient outcomes remain valid points needing resolution.A significant aspect highlighted is whether past agency reports-such as those filed by Vigilance & Enforcement bodies or CAG-can adequately complement findings presented by standalone commissions like Justice P.C. Ghose’s panel without greater collaboration or integration of evidence databases.
the debate also underscores an ongoing challenge within governance institutions: balancing political obligation with systematic checks while maintaining overall trust in oversight committees. Ensuring decisive follow-up actions will be crucial for demonstrating integrity not only within Andhra Pradesh but also setting precedents nationwide against corruption tied to public funds.