Quick Summary
Indian Opinion Analysis
The upcoming Supreme court hearing has significant implications for judicial appointments. At its core is whether candidates with past legal practice experience-but currently serving in subordinate judicial roles-can access positions reserved under constitutional provisions designed to encourage new talent from outside government service. This raises broader questions about how legal expertise and prior advocacy should balance experience gained within judiciary roles to ensure merit-based selection processes.
Should this interpretation favor allowing such candidates into bar quotas, it could alter long-standing understandings of Article 233(2) and open paths for experienced individuals within lower judiciaries to rise faster through ranks without current restrictions. Conversely, strict adherence to “not already in service” may preserve pathways firmly distinct between initial subordinate entry versus lateral high-level district-level routes promoting external diversity regulated systems checks
For further details: Source Link