The acquittal in such a high-profile terrorism-related case raises questions about judicial consistency and investigatory thoroughness. While legal systems worldwide are built on principles like “innocent until proven guilty,” prolonged delays can undermine public trust in justice delivery mechanisms-especially when cases involve dozens of victims from vulnerable communities.
This verdict might reignite debates over politicization within India’s judicial framework due to CPI(M)’s direct allegations against political entities like RSS-BJP supporting those acquitted. Furthermore, it poses challenges for communal harmony as judgments perceived as biased may exacerbate societal divisions.
For policymakers and citizens alike, clarity on due process must remain paramount to ensure every stakeholder’s confidence. Appeals might provide another avenue to re-examine evidence while learning lessons from procedural bottlenecks highlighted during this long-running litigation.