– Additional allocation points for women on transplant waiting lists to address gender disparity.
– Priority for near relatives of previous deceased donors needing transplants.
– Mandatory sharing of donor and recipient data with the national registry.
The advisory reflects an effort by NOTTO to streamline organ donation efforts but has sparked significant debate among stakeholders. While addressing gender disparity is commendable,implementing specific prioritization criteria raises practical concerns about fairness,protocols,and potential unintended consequences. similarly, granting priority to relatives of past donors may conflict with global altruistic principles that have guided organ donations as inception.
The push for mandatory data-sharing can improve transparency but might strain relationships between State governments and the Centre if it is perceived as infringing upon federal autonomy in healthcare governance. The suggested inclusion of ayurveda or yoga appears unrelated to core transplant objectives, diluting focus from critical issues requiring immediate attention.
A deeper consultative process involving all stakeholders-patients, medical experts, hospitals, states-is necessary before implementing these contentious points to ensure efficiency without compromising equity or jurisdictional harmony.
Read more: Source Link