ECI Flags Tejashwi’s EPIC Card as ‘Fake,’ Demands Submission by August 16

Quick Summary:

• The Election Commission of India (ECI) claimed that the EPIC card displayed by RJD leader Tejashwi Yadav during a press conference on August 2,2025,is fake.
• mr. Yadav alleged his name was missing from the draft electoral rolls but the ECI countered his claim, stating his name is listed wiht EPIC number RAB0456228 in official voter records.
• the EPIC number shown by Mr. Yadav at the press conference was RAB2916120, which according to ECI’s investigation dose not exist in its database or historical voter lists.
• The electoral Registration Officer (ERO) of Digha Assembly constituency has requested Mr. Yadav to submit this allegedly fake EPIC card for investigation by August 16, 2025.
• tejashwi Yadav accused the ECI of issuing two EPIC cards under his name and noted he did not receive prior notice regarding this matter.
• RJD spokesperson Chittaranjan Gagan criticized the ECI’s handling of the situation and alleged bias against Tejashwi yadav to aid political opponents.

Indian Opinion Analysis:

This controversy highlights critical issues related to electoral openness and administrative accountability in India’s voter registration process. If indeed incorrect or multiple identification numbers were issued for prominent figures like Tejashwi Yadav-who holds meaningful political influence-it raises questions about systemic reliability. From an institutional standpoint, accurate voter rolls are basic for ensuring free and fair elections.

The election commission’s insistence on retrieving evidence reflects an effort toward resolving allegations; however,it also underscores potential lapses within its registry system if duplicates are commonplace as alleged by opposition leaders. Mismanagement could fuel distrust among voters or become a flashpoint during broader discussions on matters like disenfranchisement.The polarized reactions from political parties further reveal how routine administrative issues frequently enough escalate into larger debates surrounding governance credibility. A transparent resolution backed by sufficient documentation might help rebuild public trust while maintaining neutrality in such disputes.

For more details: read Article