Ex-SC Judge Calls for SIT Probe in Dharmasthala Burials Case

Quick Summary:

• Retired Supreme Court judge Justice V. Gopala Gowda demanded a Special Examination Team (SIT) probe, overseen by a sitting or retired high Court/Supreme Court judge, into the Dharmasthala case.
• He claimed that the whistleblower is facing police pressure and alleged coercion to mark burial locations on paper.
• Justice Gowda accused authorities of leaking the whistleblower’s statement to private individuals and criticized the lack of urgency in investigating these claims, including exhuming potential remains or visiting crime locations.
• he called for an SIT led by an Additional Director General of Police (ADGP),monitored by judicial supervision at a senior level.
• potential harm to the whistleblower or his advocates would hold accountable key officials like the Home Minister and police leadership, per Justice Gowda’s warning.
• Senior advocate C.S. Dwarkanath also raised concerns about leaks from investigations and stated that steps should be taken by authorities to address these issues.

Indian Opinion Analysis:
The demands for an SIT probe highlight meaningful concerns surrounding procedural justice and openness in handling sensitive cases like Dharmasthala’s complaint allegations. Top-level judicial oversight coudl help bridge any possible trust deficit between law enforcement agencies and citizens in this matter if implemented effectively. Persistent allegations of coercion against whistleblowers undermine public confidence not only in investigation processes but also in broader governance machinery functioning within legal frameworks established for accountability.

Both judicial officials’ comments point toward systemic gaps requiring resolution urgently-a necessity that stretches beyond rhetoric into demonstrable reforms ensuring process integrity for fairness universally applied across Indian contexts where trust divides might risk heavy implications later socio-politically otherwise interconnected locally-nationally backdrop projections here operationally safeguarding democracy guarantees writ concerned criminally-linked lens impartial scales demanding truth thresholds/explanations enforcing closure equitable impartiality-wise future considerations onward responsibilities uniquely reflective India need evidences-remedial actions prompt execution practically recommended motivated genuine benefits discussion wise longer prospective lessons internal-prevent interpretations failure suppress seen fundamental rectitude prism.

Published – July 18, 2025 | For further details: Read More