This ruling by the Allahabad high Court reaffirms judiciary limits under Article 226-a critical principle ensuring courts do not overstep their constitutional boundaries into policymaking.By deferring qualification equivalency to competent authorities such as State governments or medical councils, this decision underscores institutional roles in safeguarding professional standards.For aspiring candidates like Sandhya Yadav, it highlights potential gaps between educational institutes’ claims about degrees and official recognition standards for career advancement.
The implications are clear: regulatory bodies must establish unambiguous guidelines concerning academic equivalencies to prevent eligibility disputes in hiring procedures. Without clarity, similar cases could arise, affecting candidates and possibly delaying recruitment processes crucial to public welfare systems like food safety.
Read more at the Hindu