ICSSR Serves Notice to CSDS Over Alleged Irregularities, Claims ECI Defamation

Swift Summary

• ICSSR Show Cause Notice: The indian Council of Social Science Research (ICSSR) issued a show cause notice to the centre for the Study of Developing Societies (CSDS) accusing it of “scandalising adn maligning” the Election commission of India (ECI).
• Funding at Stake: CSDS receives meaningful financial support from ICSSR. Between 2020-21 and Q1 2023-24,CSDS was allocated ₹13.92 crore under ICSSR’s Grant-in-Aid scheme. The notice threatens withdrawal of this funding.
• Claims Against CSDS: Eleven major irregularities cited, including:

– Alleged biased interpretation in a study on Bihar electoral roll revision titled “How inclusive is EC’s special revision exercise?”
– Issues with data analysis on Maharashtra elections and public statements later retracted.
– Multiple administrative and financial irregularities:
– Violations in faculty appointments, promotions, payment procedures (e.g., House Rent Allowance misuse), non-compliance with audit norms.
– Lack of governance openness in leadership elections/appointments.
– Alleged misuse/non-disclosure related to foreign funds under FCRA norms.

• FIRs Filed: Police complaints were filed against a CSDS faculty member for spreading false claims about voter declines on social media; he later apologized but sought legal advice.

Indian opinion Analysis

This controversy highlights several critical areas-academic freedom, transparency in governance, and accountability within institutions receiving public money. At its core lies the tension between autonomous research critiques versus accusations that such work could undermine constitutional bodies like the ECI.For India, managing this balance is vital to ensure robust institutional credibility while allowing academic scrutiny necessary for democratic functioning.

The threatened withdrawal of ICSSR funding may have broader implications for research institutions relying heavily on government grants; though, adherence to rules governing recruitment practices or financial audits remains non-negotiable if public resources are involved. As this case unfolds amidst allegations varying from procedural lapses to active misinformation campaigns by staff members as per FIRs-a thorough examination will be essential to determine responsibility without compromising systemic integrity or research autonomy.

Read more at The hindu