Rapid Summary
- Karnataka Cabinet revises internal reservation among Scheduled Castes, removing 1% quota for 59 microscopic communities and grouping them with othre ‘touchable’ SC groups like Korama, Koracha, Lambani, and Bhovi.
- Chief Minister Siddaramaiah defended the decision citing technical challenges in assigning roster points.
- The 59 communities are severely socio-economically backward with a low literacy rate. Together they represent only 0.86% of government employment and 0.09% political representation and have minimal access to government benefits.
- These previously most-backward communities were categorized under Category A to prioritize reservation due to their extreme deprivation.
- Concerns have been raised by activists over competing with numerically larger castes that are better off socio-economically within their new category groupings.
- Dalit Right (Holeyas) groups largely support internal reservations but want clarity on segregation within the reservation matrix upon further census data collection.Activists from microscopic communities voice dissatisfaction over lack of consideration for commission recommendations or addressing extreme disparity among subgroups.
Indian Opinion Analysis
The Karnataka government’s decision to restructure quotas for Scheduled Castes reflects evolving complexities in India’s affirmative action policies meant to address social justice concerns amid finite resources. While internal reservations aim at ensuring equitable distribution among SC subgroups, clubbing severely deprived microscopic communities with numerically dominant ones risks overshadowing their specific needs due to systemic disparities highlighted in the survey data (e.g., literacy rates, socioeconomic status). Better-off castes within this grouping may disproportionately benefit due to comparative accessibility.
Political implications also emerge as diverse factions push competing interests-for improved equity or numerical advantage-underscoring challenges governments face balancing ancient injustices against contemporary demands for inclusive growth strategies. Long-term resolution might depend on more granular caste-based census results informing policy refinements aimed at sustaining social inclusion without diluting targeted welfare initiatives.
Read More: Source Link