– Errors in income tax returns can now be corrected up to four years post-assessment year without penalties.
– Assessment reopening period reduced from six to five years.
– Separation of technical provisions like MAT and AMT into distinct sections for clarity.
– Tax officials’ authority extended-assessees may need to share passwords for electronic systems, emails, or social media accounts under investigation. Officials may override access codes if passwords are unavailable.
The passage of the income Tax Bill represents a significant modernization effort aimed at making tax legislation accessible and less prone to misuse by officials. By simplifying language and restructuring provisions, the government seeks an easier compliance framework that benefits taxpayers while reducing loopholes tied common bureaucratic harassment.However, expanded powers granted regarding electronic searches raise valid concerns about privacy infringement-a potential downside that risks overreach into personal information not strictly relevant to taxation matters. This tension could prompt further scrutiny on balancing clarity in financial investigations with individual privacy safeguards.
On balance, while many revisions align positively with governance reform goals-streamlining procedures and fostering taxpayer trust-the implications of surveillance extensions deserve careful monitoring as taxpayers react over time.