The decision by the High Court reiterates a legal principle that courts do not usually intervene in government policy unless basic rights are at stake. This preserves democratic governance by allowing elected representatives to craft policies based on local priorities. However, debates surrounding NEP-2020 highlight broader tensions between national uniformity and regional autonomy in shaping India’s educational framework. For students and educators in Karnataka, discontinuing NEP may lead to uncertainty during transitional phases.
The ruling underscores India’s federal structure where states retain notable powers over education policy under legislative provisions. While this autonomy allows states like Karnataka adaptability to tailor their strategy for local needs, it also risks fragmentation if major reforms like NEP are abandoned mid-way without robust alternatives.
Read more: https://www.thehindu.com