Karnataka Proposes Reduction in Buffer Zones Around Water Bodies

Quick Summary

• Proposal Details: Karnataka Government plans to revise buffer zones around water bodies (tanks, lakes, canals) based on their size.

– For tanks: No buffer for those under 5 guntas; incremental buffers ranging from 3 meters for medium-sized tanks to 30 meters for tanks over 100 acres.
– For canals: Reduced buffer zones-15 meters for primary canals (down from 30), 10 meters (secondary), and 5 meters (tertiary).

• Current Standard: Buffer zones now follow a National green Tribunal (NGT) order of 2016, later modified by the Supreme Court and adopted in Karnataka since a State government order in 2019.

• Public Concerns: Drinking water pipelines, roads, sewage treatment plants often reside within existing buffer areas. Critics have argued current uniform guidelines fail to account for varying sizes of water bodies.

• Background Research:

– Studies cited from states like Tamil Nadu, Gujarat, Telangana reflect diverse approaches to buffer zoning with size-specific guidelines.
– Udupi district identified cases where actual water body sizes were smaller than declared buffer zones.

• Proposed Benefits:

– Infrastructure projects supporting public services will align better with zone revisions.
– Prevention of flooding and focus on building nearby sewage treatment facilities while minimizing negative impacts on aquatic ecosystems.
– Promotes balance between development needs and conservation priorities.

Indian Opinion Analysis

The revised proposal by the Karnataka Government reflects an attempt to address disparities arising out of uniformed versus size-based zoning rules around water bodies-a first-of-its-kind approach nationally. While proponents argue this change aligns infrastructure development with ecological preservation goals more effectively, it remains crucial that implementation undergo transparent monitoring to ensure neither floods nor long-term impairment of aquatic life occur as unintended consequences.Further scrutiny could examine how similar zoning models in neighboring states have been triumphant in reconciling urban planning imperatives with environmental stewardship. Public engagement remains imperative as communities living near these waterways are most affected by changes in rules governing these spaces.

Although balancing real estate interests against ecological priorities forms the undertone here, sticking unequivocally to data-backed research findings will reduce skepticism and foster trust among stakeholders about such sweeping structural reforms in resource management policy.

Read more