KEAM Releases Revised Rank List with New Toppers

Rapid Summary:

• Revised KEAM 2025 Rank List Published: The Commissioner for Entrance Examinations released the updated rank list following Kerala High Court orders to revert to the original normalization formula.
• Impact on State board Students: Important drop in toppers from the State Board, with only 21 students making it to the top 100 ranks compared to 43 under the earlier invalidated formula.
• Top Scorers:

– Joshua Jacob Thomas of Thiruvananthapuram topped with a score of 588.5773, reshuffling from fifth place under previous rankings.
– Hari Kishan Baiju (Ernakulam) retained second position; positions three through six included Emil Iype Sacharia (Thiruvananthapuram), Adyl Zayaan (Kozhikode), Adhvaith Ayinippilly and Ananya Rajeev (both Karnataka).
– Former first-ranker John Sinoj slipped to seventh place after recalibration of marks.

• Reserved Category Highlights: Hridin S. Biju of Kasaragod ranked highest among Scheduled Caste candidates; Sabarinath K.S. of Kottayam led among Scheduled Tribe candidates.
• Participation Statistics:

– Total students appeared: 86,549
– Qualified students: 76,230
– Included in final engineering rank list: 67,505

• High Court Intervention: The Division Bench upheld the Single Bench’s ruling which annulled earlier results prepared using a new formula inconsistent with the prospectus issued in February.

Indian Opinion Analysis:

The Kerala High Court’s intervention underscores a need for adherence to established procedural norms while implementing changes affecting public examinations. By restoring normalisation as per official guidelines set out in February’s prospectus-overriding government deviations-the judiciary highlighted clarity and fairness as critical pillars underpinning merit evaluations.

The sharp decrease in top-performing State Board students may revive debates over state curriculum competitiveness vis-à-vis other boards at national examinations-a concern likely requiring long-term systemic reforms aiming at equitability across educational standards in India.

This development reiterates that legal oversight can play an instrumental role in safeguarding fairness even within highly competitive academic processes like entrance tests. For policymakers and education stakeholders alike,this serves as both corrective precedent and cautionary tale against bypassing expert recommendations prematurely or inconsistently.

Read more: [Link unavailable]