Kerala Governor Rejects LDF’s Mediation, Reappoints Interim V-Cs for DUK and KTU

Swift Summary

• kerala Governor’s Decision: Kerala Governor Rajendra Vishwanath Arlekar reappointed Ciza Thomas and K. Sivaprasad as interim Vice-Chancellors of Digital University Kerala (DUK) and APJ Abdul Kalam Technological University (KTU).
• Tensions with State Government: Teh decision defies reconciliation efforts from Chief Minister Pinarayi Vijayan’s administration, sparking further tensions between the Governor and State government.
• Supreme Court Judgment Debate: State Law Minister P.Rajeeve criticized the move as an “open challenge” to the Supreme Court’s judgment, which allegedly mandates consultation between the Chancellor and government for such appointments.
• Governor’s Stance: Raj Bhavan stated that the appointments align with Supreme Court directives and relevant laws governing universities.
• Previous Disregard of Recommendations: Panels submitted by the State government were earlier ignored during initial appointments in November 2024, marking this as a second instance of bypassing governmental recommendations.
• government Response & Future Actions: Higher Education Minister R.Bindu accused current and former Governors of acting against Constitutional duties motivated by political interests. The State likely plans to bring its concerns to the Supreme Court.

Indian Opinion analysis

The reappointment controversy highlights ongoing conflicts between constitutional authorities-Governors-and elected state governments in India. Such disputes are not uncommon but underline tensions in federal governance where ceremonial roles like Chancellorship intersect with executive functions.

For Kerala, this particular standoff might impact administrative harmony over university governance, perhaps leading to delays or legal uncertainties concerning regular vice-Chancellor appointments. It raises broader questions about systemic clarity on powers vested in Governors versus elected governments regarding higher education administration.

While both sides cite legal backing for their actions, prolonged disagreements could affect public universities’ functioning-placing focus on efficiency rather than institutional wrangling should ideally be prioritized moving forward.

Link for more details: Source Article