The Supreme Court’s observations reaffirm the role of lawyers in safeguarding clients’ rights while drawing a clear boundary between legal counsel adn participation in criminal activities. This distinction helps ensure that investigative authorities balance their mandate with respecting professional privileges afforded to attorneys.
The recommendations by Vikas Singh advocating judicial oversight over summons issuance indicate an intention to prevent misuse or overreach by probe agencies.While procedural safeguards are vital, simplistic systems might risk delays, especially in urgent cases requiring quick action. Solicitor General Mehta’s caution against “unmanageable guidelines” underscores this potential concern.From an institutional outlook, these discussions signal efforts toward improving checks and balances within India’s investigation protocols-a move consistent with strengthening democratic accountability. The upcoming August 12 hearing may provide further clarity on achieving this balance without compromising investigatory efficiency.