Malegaon Blast Verdict: BJP Leaders Demand Apology from Congress, Digvijaya Singh

Quick Summary

• A special NIA court in Mumbai acquitted all seven accused, including former BJP MP Pragya Singh Thakur and Lt. Col. Prasad Purohit, in the 2008 Malegaon blast case on July 31, 2025.
• The court ruled that the prosecution failed to prove its case, granting the accused “the benefit of doubt.” The blast on September 29, 2008, in Malegaon city killed six people.
• Senior BJP leaders demanded an apology from Congress for allegedly creating narratives such as “Hindu terrorism.”
• Former Madhya Pradesh CM Uma Bharti alleged Congress leader Digvijaya Singh coined the term “saffron terrorism” to defame Hindutva globally.
• MP Chief Minister Mohan Yadav called the verdict a strong rebuke to what he termed Congress’ “narrow-minded mentality,” demanding a public apology.
• indore businessman Shyam Sahu, discharged in december 2017 from the same case after being arrested in October 2008, claimed all accused were framed and described personal tragedy during his imprisonment.

Indian Opinion Analysis

The acquittal of all accused persons in the malegaon blast case highlights longstanding concerns about prosecutorial challenges and judicial standards when dealing with terrorism-related cases. Courts granting “benefit of doubt” frequently enough indicate deficiencies in evidence or flaws during inquiry stages-key areas where institutional improvements might potentially be critical for India’s justice system.On another note, calls by political leaders for apologies from other parties underscore how sensitive issues around religion and nationality intertwine with perceptions about justice delivery mechanisms. Given this backdrop, India faces demands not only to ensure proper accountability within law enforcement agencies but also to strengthen public trust that legal judgments remain independent of ideological divisions or political narratives.

For more details: link