This ruling highlights growing judicial intolerance toward defamatory remarks made online, especially those targeting institutions such as courts. By emphasizing evidence in its verdict-Facebook posts and witness testimonies-the Kerala High Court reiterates its commitment to protecting judicial independence from perceived external attacks or baseless allegations. The imposition of both imprisonment and monetary penalties serves as an explicit deterrent against misuse of social media platforms for spreading unsubstantiated accusations.
While precedence suggests leniency when apologies are tendered sincerely (as in previous instances involving Suresh Kumar), repeat offenses appear to carry unavoidable consequences signaling stricter standards moving forward in digital-era accountability mechanisms within Indian democracy.