Missing Names on Bihar SIR List: What It Means

Quick Summary

• the Election Commission of India (ECI) has completed the first phase of the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls in Bihar, with a draft voter list published on August 1, 2025.
• Over 65 lakh names were removed from the previous rolls due to reasons like death (22.34 lakh), permanent migration or being untraceable (36.28 lakh), and duplicate registrations (7.01 lakh).
• Draft rolls now include 7.24 crore voters compared to the earlier list with 7.89 crore voters.
• Concerns have emerged over higher voter deletions in Muslim-majority districts and an unusual dip in women voters compared to men, despite more male labour migration outside Bihar.
• Voters could submit forms without supporting documents initially; verification will be handled by Electoral Registration Officers (EROs) who may conduct field inquiries for disputed or unclear cases.
• Political parties and organizations have raised claims about non-transparency in the removals process, prompting objections filed with both ECI and ongoing hearings at the Supreme Court.
• The final voter roll is expected to be published on September 30 after scrutiny of claims or objections.

Indian Opinion Analysis

The first phase of Bihar’s Special Intensive Revision marks a notable exercise toward improving electoral accuracy but has also triggered concerns over its execution’s transparency and inclusivity. While legitimate removal of deceased or duplicate entries is critical for curbing electoral malpractices, reports highlighting disproportionate deletions in Muslim-majority areas and among women warrant thorough investigation given their potential implications for depiction equity.The EC’s provision allowing submissions without documents aimed at inclusion but remains vulnerable to subjective discretion during verification by officials – a process requiring clear accountability mechanisms as outlined under law.Additionally, political objections claiming inadequate access to removal details underline the necessity for procedural transparency across party lines.This review signals broader challenges tied to ensuring credible participation while maintaining fairness amidst demographic complexities within India’s largest democracy.

Read More