India faces a rising burden of heart disease, including coronary artery disease. Adoption of improved therapies such as clopidogrel could save many lives if proven effective on a larger scale. However, before replacing universally prescribed low-dose aspirin with clopidogrel in treatment guidelines, India would need localized studies assessing its cost-effectiveness and impact on diverse populations. Accessibility within India’s public health system is crucial; high-quality generic alternatives would need to remain affordable.
The study’s apparent benefits position clopidogrel as an option worth considering by policymakers while outlining precautions against premature shifts without verifying long-term population-level outcomes. This balanced approach reflects India’s unique challenges regarding healthcare affordability and diversity in patient profiles.