The denial of specific details about the status and functioning of RSS raises broader questions about transparency regarding influential organisations operating publicly. While citing privacy provisions under Section 8(J) is legally valid for third-party information not directly impacting public interest, this ambiguity may fuel public perception issues concerning accountability. Moreover, mr. Modi describing RSS as an NGO increases scrutiny over its formal legitimacy or adherence to regulations governing such entities in India.
For democratic institutions like India’s Right to Information mechanism to maintain trustworthiness among citizens, consistent clarity on organisational frameworks-especially those referenced by leaders-remains critical. This situation reflects ongoing tensions between transparency demands versus constraints imposed by privacy laws.
read more: Click here