– Clarity on implementation.
– Use of private vehicles for delivery and their payment terms.
– Details regarding the reported ₹30 crore additional expenditure and its allocation.
The critique by Edappadi K.Palaniswami underscores questions about clarity,clarity,and potential duplication in public welfare programs. While delivering ration goods to vulnerable groups is a commendable goal, concerns over cost management (₹30 crore expenditure) and operational logistics need further addressing for broader acceptance. The overlap with previous policies raises valid discussions about continuity versus innovation in governance. Ensuring accountability through clear tender processes would boost trust in such initiatives while enabling smoother bipartisan dialog on public welfare models.Read More: TheHindu.com