Presidential References: Key Cases and Supreme Court Opinions Explained

quick Summary

• Presidential Reference: President Droupadi Murmu referred a legal question to the Supreme Court on July 22, 2025, concerning timelines and guidelines for Governors and the President in granting assent to State Bills.
• Context: The reference follows the supreme Court’s judgment voiding her prior decisions regarding Tamil Nadu Bills. the Court had set time limits (1-3 months) for Governors on future bills.
• Constitutional Basis: Article 143 allows Presidents to seek opinions from the Supreme Court on legal matters of public importance. While not binding legally, thes opinions are generally followed by courts and governments.
• Historical Instances of References: A detailed overview listed previous Presidential references since 1951 covering topics like minority rights in education, constitutional amendments, taxation immunity, special courts post-Emergency, water-sharing agreements, auctioning natural resources, among others.

Indian Opinion Analysis

the matter under consideration highlights an ongoing tension between constitutional functionaries at Union and State levels. Setting definitive timelines for assenting State Bills could streamline legislative processes but also raises concerns over autonomy in decision-making by Governors and the President’s office. Historically important as yet another Presidential reference under Article 143 of India’s Constitution-the outcome may clarify ambiguities related to governance structures while balancing judicial oversight with executive discretion.Such clarification could have widespread implications across all States concerning governance efficiency. Though, adhering strictly to constitutional provisions without overstepping judiciary bounds will be critical for institutional harmony.

Read More: The Hindu