The High court’s interim stay on Punjab’s Land Pooling Policy underscores serious procedural gaps in its formulation. Key criticisms include failure to conduct statutory Social Impact Assessments or address rehabilitation needs of vulnerable groups like landless laborers who rely on agricultural systems for their livelihoods. These omissions not only raise legal objections but also amplify public distrust among stakeholders such as farmers.
Opposition claims about potential misuse of agricultural lands strengthen resistance against government-backed reforms when paired with calls for procedural accountability. by contrast, AAP’s defense branding this initiative “farmer-friendly” may fall short if substantive concerns around inclusivity and transparency persist unresolved.
The unfolding legal battle holds significant implications for participatory governance models aimed at sustainable development. Future success will likely hinge upon reconciling stakeholder trust through robust due diligence processes while addressing socio-economic displacement risks tied significantly to rural economies.
Read more: [Link Unavailable]