Rahul Gandhi Challenges Varanasi Court Order in High Court Over Remarks

Quick Summary

• Congress leader Rahul Gandhi has filed a revision petition in the Allahabad High Court.
• The petition challenges the decision of a Special MP/MLA Court in Varanasi, which directed a subordinate court to rehear an application for registering an FIR against Gandhi over remarks about Sikhs during his U.S. visit in September 2024.
• In November 2024, the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate (ACJM) MP-MLA, Varanasi rejected this application citing lack of jurisdiction since the statement was made outside India.
• The decision rejecting jurisdiction was later overturned by the Special judge (MP/MLA) on July 21, 2025, asking ACJM to reopen and reassess matters afresh.
• Mr. Gandhi’s legal team claims this ruling by the special court is “wrong, illegal and without jurisdiction.”
• The remarks in question suggested “an unfavorable habitat for Sikhs” in India and prompted protests back home as some perceived them to be “provocative and divisive.”
• A Varanasi resident attempted unsuccessfully to file an FIR at sarnath police station before moving his application through the legal system.

Indian Opinion Analysis

The ongoing legal tussle surrounding Rahul Gandhi’s statements underscores complex questions about both freedom of speech and accountability in international contexts.At its core lies a debate over whether domestic courts have jurisdiction over comments made abroad if they are deemed contentious locally. This case could set important precedents for how Indian judiciary approaches extraterritorial matters involving its citizens.

politically charged cases such as these also highlight tensions between expressions viewed as critical dissent versus those considered inflammatory by parts of public opinion. This incident emphasizes two critical aspects for India: safeguarding public harmony amidst diversity while ensuring fairness when legal disputes intersect with political controversies.

Read More