Quick Summary:
- Leader of the Opposition, V.D. Satheesan, criticized Kerala’s Left Democratic Front (LDF) government for alleged mismanagement of the higher education sector under Chief Minister Pinarayi Vijayan.
- He claimed that most universities in Kerala lack Vice-Chancellors adn manny colleges are without Principals. Postgraduate courses have been discontinued, while several degree courses have low enrollment.
- Thousands of certificates await signatures from Vice-Chancellors, and new course approvals remain pending with the government. Many students are reportedly leaving Kerala for better educational opportunities elsewhere.
- Satheesan accused the Governor and the state government of engaging in political power struggles at the expense of students’ futures.
- He pointed to protests over a Senate hall rented for a private function as evidence of misplaced priorities within governance.
- Alleged threats against dissenting voices were tied to fostering a “risky political culture.” Additionally, Satheesan contrasted criticisms against Congress by media with perceived leniency toward groups like SFI and DYFI.
- Satheesan leveled serious accusations about Pinarayi Vijayan’s past connections with RSS and BJP leadership.
Indian Opinion Analysis:
Satheesan’s allegations underscore critical issues facing Kerala’s higher education system, including administrative vacancies and declining participation in academic programs. If true, such systemic lapses could undermine confidence in public institutions and push students to seek alternative options elsewhere. Furthermore, recurring tensions between Raj Bhavan (Governor) and state leadership signal deeper challenges in institutional coordination that may require resolution through dialog rather than confrontation.
The accusation regarding Mr. Vijayan’s ties to RSS or BJP might reflect sharpening political rhetoric ahead of upcoming elections but does little to address practical concerns over policy failures or governance inefficiencies raised during his remarks. Lastly, claims about selective media narratives warrant reflection on whether bias impacts public discourse around key developments affecting citizens.
For read more: Source